Problems to be solved

[[e-mail]]

Websites such as this only stirs up the vigilantism of the public.
Banning these sites would bring a bit of sanity and unprejudiced
realism to an otherwise warped situation.


http://www.kidslivesafe.com/signup/default23.aspx?c=19&scn=WPGoogle&sca=Master&gclid=CM_yyKi4-rUCFadFMgodRSAACQ&vid=242054415ec4e4967fb292966f697a0e

[Frank McCoy]

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
Websites such as this only stirs up the vigilantism of the public.
Banning these sites would bring a bit of sanity and unprejudiced
realism to an otherwise warped situation.
http: A-Website

Not even looking at the site, I have this remark:
Censorship almost always causes FAR more problems than it solves.
Besides, who is going to decide what WE like to see, watch, and
listen-to is unfit for us to observe?
How much do YOU trust somebody else to tell you what's fit for you to
know?
Isn't somebody who likes to watch (filth, hate-material, obscenity,
FITB) exactly the person you *don't* want in control of censorship?
And yet, what person would WANT such a job except the very pervert or
hate-monger you despise most? And, if-not, wouldn't said censor be
seduced and perverted by watching all that crap?

In a way, it's rather like all government:
Anybody who WANTS the job should automatically be disqualified!

It's FINE when YOU get to do the deciding for somebody ELSE.
However, when somebody ELSE decides for YOU ....
The shoe is on the other foot, isn't it?

Frex: Knowing how much you despise me ... How would you feel If I got
to decide what is or is-not proper for YOU to see?

No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

The soapbox is empty.
NEXT!

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[Dead Ted]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
Websites such as this only stirs up the vigilantism of the public.
Banning these sites would bring a bit of sanity and unprejudiced
realism to an otherwise warped situation.
http: A-Website

Censorship almost always causes FAR more problems than it solves.
Besides, who is going to decide what WE like to see, watch, and
listen-to is unfit for us to observe?
How much do YOU trust somebody else to tell you what's fit for you to
know?
Isn't somebody who likes to watch (filth, hate-material, obscenity,
FITB) exactly the person you *don't* want in control of censorship?
And yet, what person would WANT such a job except the very pervert or
hate-monger you despise most?  And, if-not, wouldn't said censor be
seduced and perverted by watching all that crap?
Anybody who WANTS the job should automatically be disqualified!
It's FINE when YOU get to do the deciding for somebody ELSE.
However, when somebody ELSE decides for YOU ....
The shoe is on the other foot, isn't it?
Frex: Knowing how much you despise me ... How would you feel If I got
to decide what is or is-not proper for YOU to see?
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Tedward

Post by Frank McCoy
The soapbox is empty.
NEXT!
--
    _____
     /  '               / ™
  ,-/-, __  __.  ____  /_
 (_/   / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[Frank McCoy]

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[-̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys true
leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website in the
past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw what it was
about he fled like a predator on the run.
--

''Thanking Obama for killing Bin Laden is like thanking Ronald
McDonald for inventing the Big Mac. You thank the one who
made the burger, not the clown''

"Well he's a friend of those long haired, hippy type, pinko fags
I'll betcha he's even got a Commie flag tacked up on the wall
inside of his garage"~~The Charlie Daniels Band.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|^^^^^^^ |P
| ♥~♥ Usenet Legends bobandcarole ♥~♥ ||”"”;..\___.
| ……_______________| l______________l _||__|…, ]P
“(@)’(@)”""""""*l'(@)l'(@)l """"""""""""""(@)'(@)""""'(@)

̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™bobaлdcaяole -̮̮̃-̃
Copyright © 2013
all rights reserved
News*Justice*Social Commentary
"Bringing you the ultimate uncensored truth since 1997"
___

"I think we'll be seeing less of bobandcarole...at least while I'm
around" ~''ScottyFLL'' {2007}, Former Fool & Court Jester of APH
...............................................................................................
#1 pedophile hunters: The Urban Dictionary & Evil-Unveiled.com:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bobandcarole

http://evil-unveiled.com/Alt.support.boy-lovers
........................................................................................
#5 ruiner of usenet.
.......................................................................................
Owner and trainer of Tom Evans aka "mad as a box of frogs"
aka "bit" aka Tom Evans. His actual picture:http://bayimg.com/
faJBbaAcd
.........................................................................................
"Publicity is publicity, good or bad it's STILL publicity"~ Alice
Cooper
.........................................................................................
"Did you plug the hole yet Daddy?"~~Malia Obama
.........................................................................................
Now I know why they call him tiger, "ELDRICK TONT Woods"?? LMAO!! .
..............................................................................................
"There are 1000 or more reasons for a person INNOCENT of child
molesting to kill themselves"~ Arrested filth-monger frank mccoy
.............................................................................................
"A victory for one pornographer is a victory for all of the human
race"--pedophile "XXX"
...........................................................................................
Image snap of Court and Conviction Record, Scott Salberg.
Loading Image...
..........................................................................................
"I am so superior to you that you can't even see it"~ScottyFLL
aka "Enos Penvy"-- <enospenvy @null.net>
violent criminal, Broward County Fla.
............................................................................................
"You are not decent citizens, you are sick, degenerate filth. The
fact that you attend church regularly proves it"~W.T.S.--
<m14m @earthlink.net>
.............................................................................................
"Only becasue they [bestiality and necrophilia] both ARE,
[harmless] for those who get off on that sort of thing. And what
*they* do is absolutely NONE of my busines NOR any of my concern NOR
that of anyone else!!"~~Craig Chilton <r @z.com> showcases why he's
designated a ko0k even by those he claims to defend and shows his
ignorance in using a spell checker..
.............................................................................................
"I understand, you guys{The UTB} i assume you belong? have been
around forever, and are clearly a force to be reckoned with"~~Carl
<carrrrrrl @gmail.com> makes a correct statement for the first time in
his life
..............................................................................................

Why should I have to press one for English??? This is AMERICA
<This space for rent> .

[Frank McCoy]

-???-? ??????•?? ™Usenet Legends ªºªand?a®ole

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys true
leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website in the
past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw what it was
about he fled like a predator on the run.

Can't differentiate between "Doesn't want" and "is afraid", can you?
Why would I want to look at ANY link you provide?

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[[e-mail]]

Post by Frank McCoy
-???-? ??????•?? ™Usenet Legends ªºªand?a®ole

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys true
leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website in the
past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw what it was
about he fled like a predator on the run.

Can't differentiate between "Doesn't want" and "is afraid", can you?
Why would I want to look at ANY link you provide?

the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

[Frank McCoy]

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal

Post by Frank McCoy
-???-? ??????•?? ™Usenet Legends ªºªand?a®ole

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys true
leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website in the
past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw what it was
about he fled like a predator on the run.

Can't differentiate between "Doesn't want" and "is afraid", can you?
Why would I want to look at ANY link you provide?

the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.
Most especially not, considering your comment above.

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[[e-mail]]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal

Post by Frank McCoy
-???-? ??????•?? ™Usenet Legends ªºªand?a®ole

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys true
leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website in the
past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw what it was
about he fled like a predator on the run.

Can't differentiate between "Doesn't want" and "is afraid", can you?
Why would I want to look at ANY link you provide?

the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.
Most especially not, considering your comment above.

What part of my comment was distasteful for you? Do you not champion
the rights of *we the people* ? Is writing novels your only way to
voice your staunch approval for real change?

[Frank McCoy]

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
What part of my comment was distasteful for you? Do you not champion
the rights of *we the people* ? Is writing novels your only way to
voice your staunch approval for real change?

<Sigh.>
It's not your *comment* that was distasteful.
You described the site enough for me to know that I wouldn't like IT.
Why should I go look at a web-page that I know I won't like?
Do you somehow think I LIKE to be offended?

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[Nemo]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
What part of my comment was distasteful for you? Do you not champion
the rights of *we the people* ? Is writing novels your only way to
voice your staunch approval for real change?

<Sigh.>
It's not your *comment* that was distasteful.
You described the site enough for me to know that I wouldn't like IT.
Why should I go look at a web-page that I know I won't like?
Do you somehow think I LIKE to be offended?

[:o( expression] Iyyy'm used to it!

Nemo. (Still alive!)

[DocBGK]

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica
about little girls being raped by their fathers. "My 9 year old
daughter wanted it...".

[Frank McCoy]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica

Actually, I *DON'T* invite people to read my stories.
In-fact, I deliberately make them hard to find, link-to, extract, and
read. When posted in *appropriate* newsgroups where similar material
is found, I still include headers and warnings, so those people who
don't like that kind of material can easily avoid it.

People have to go LOOKING for my stories to find them.
The only public links to my stories are those posted by people like
the boob, who are deliberately trying to offend people.

(I've warned him that such postings could get *him* arrested; as
that's what the charge was against me ... Only there, I was
specifically ASKED where my stories were.)

No, I don't advertise my stories.
I don't post links to them.
I don't ask people to read them.
I make it harder to find them by not providing direct links.
I don't WANT people to read my stories if that type offends them.

So ... How is that even slightly different from me not wanting to
follow a link that I'm fairly sure would offend ME?

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[DocBGK]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica

Actually, I *DON'T* invite people to read my stories.

Bullshit Frank. You prattle on and on about how available they still
are, and how they can be found by Googling your name, and all the rave
reviews you continue to get from fellow deviants, you sick pervert.

[Frank McCoy]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica

Actually, I *DON'T* invite people to read my stories.

Bullshit Frank. You prattle on and on about how available they still
are, and how they can be found by *************, and all the rave
reviews you continue to get from fellow deviants, you sick pervert.

Check again. Only people like *YOU* tell others how to find them, in
the way you describe. (AND, like you just did above!!!) *I* don't!
I never did. Go back through any and all of my posts; and you won't
find any such thing. Boob and Company have been doing that for years.

As to the "rave reviews" I mention; that's only in response to people
(again like you) who attest that everybody else in the world despises
them. Actually, I get very few "rave reviews". Just hundreds to
single-digits in-favor versus those against. Even of those who really
*like* my stories, I find a large majority who prefer other writers of
similar stories to mine. I'm not THAT good a writer. Decent,
pot-boiler material probably, not all that bad, but not all that great
either. I just attest (and in court) that my material is
"literature". Perhaps not great literature. Maybe not even *good*
literature; but literature nonetheless.

Most writers of any type of literature really aren't all that great.
Sturgeon's law applies. Mine is probably mediocre at best. But
(contrary to popular opinion) writings don't have to be great, good,
or even decent to be literature.

You've been reading FAR more into my posts than ever I wrote.
I appreciate the effort, but it's really unnecessary.

The only thing I'm adamant about in defending my stories, is when
describing what they are NOT.
They're not rape stories.
They're not stories of abuse.
They're not snuff stories. (Nobody dies in "An Erotic Story".)
Oh yeah: I DO attest that they're all LOVE stories ... every one.

The accusations of them being abuse, rape, snuff, and other worse
things are all made by people who really never read them; because if
they had, they wouldn't find ANY of that stuff in a single one.

The argument about whether "statutory rape" is really rape, is a
completely different discussion. Calling something rape, especially
making a law that way, cheapens the tragedy of those who actually have
been raped.

Oh yeah: Your argument about my saying they're still available.
They are. Legally, I'm not even allowed to remove them. (Not that I
could, or even have the authority to do so except by asking politely.)
But people have to go LOOKING for them. I don't tell anybody where to
find them or how to access them.

The soapbox is empty.
NEXT!

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[DocBGK]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica

Actually, I *DON'T* invite people to read my stories.

Bullshit Frank. You prattle on and on about how available they still
are, and how they can be found by *************, and all the rave
reviews you continue to get from fellow deviants, you sick pervert.

Check again.  Only people like *YOU* tell others how to find them, in
the way you describe.  (AND, like you just did above!!!)  *I* don't!
I never did.

Frank, I was repeating what I have read from you alone, not anyone
else.
You're the one who gave me the 411 on you. Sure, there's other
sources, but you're the horse's mouth.

[Dead Ted]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica

Actually, I *DON'T* invite people to read my stories.

Bullshit Frank. You prattle on and on about how available they still
are, and how they can be found by *************, and all the rave
reviews you continue to get from fellow deviants, you sick pervert.

Check again.  Only people like *YOU* tell others how to find them, in
the way you describe.  (AND, like you just did above!!!)  *I* don't!
I never did.  Go back through any and all of my posts; and you won't
find any such thing.  Boob and Company have been doing that for years.

Its not like they are hard to find anyway, Frank. Any first grader
with the skills to Google your name will find links to your websites
and your incest-child rape stories.

As to the "rave reviews" I mention; that's only in response to people
(again like you) who attest that everybody else in the world despises
them.  Actually, I get very few "rave reviews".  Just hundreds to
single-digits in-favor versus those against.  Even of those who really
*like* my stories, I find a large majority who prefer other writers of
similar stories to mine.
I'm not THAT good a writer.

That is an understatement.

pot-boiler material probably, not all that bad, but not all that great
either.  I just attest (and in court) that my material is
"literature".  Perhaps not great literature.  Maybe not even *good*
literature; but literature nonetheless.
Most writers of any type of literature really aren't all that great.
Sturgeon's law applies.  Mine is probably mediocre at best.  But
(contrary to popular opinion) writings don't have to be great, good,
or even decent to be literature.
You've been reading FAR more into my posts than ever I wrote.
I appreciate the effort, but it's really unnecessary.
The only thing I'm adamant about in defending my stories, is when
describing what they are NOT.
They're not rape stories.

*Any* sex with preteens is considered statutory rape. Your stories
feature this type of material regularly.

They're not stories of abuse.

Sex with children is child abuse.

They're not snuff stories.  (Nobody dies in "An Erotic Story".)
Oh yeah: I DO attest that they're all LOVE stories ... every one.

I would imagine some of them would probably wish they were dead if
they survived a rl situation like your smut.

The accusations of them being abuse, rape, snuff, and other worse
things are all made by people who really never read them; because if
they had, they wouldn't find ANY of that stuff in a single one.
The argument about whether "statutory rape" is really rape, is a
completely different discussion.  Calling something rape, especially
making a law that way, cheapens the tragedy of those who actually have
been raped.

You call a spade a spade. statutory rape *is* rape. Try telling the
judge it isnt.

Oh yeah: Your argument about my saying they're still available.
They are.  Legally, I'm not even allowed to remove them.  (Not that I
could, or even have the authority to do so except by asking politely.)
But people have to go LOOKING for them.  I don't tell anybody where to
find them or how to access them.

Again finding them is all too easy, Frank. They can easily be found
accidentally.

Tedward

[Frank McCoy]

Post by Dead Ted

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy
OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.

And yet you invite people to read your plethora of sleazy erotica

Actually, I *DON'T* invite people to read my stories.

Bullshit Frank. You prattle on and on about how available they still
are, and how they can be found by *************, and all the rave
reviews you continue to get from fellow deviants, you sick pervert.

Check again.  Only people like *YOU* tell others how to find them, in
the way you describe.  (AND, like you just did above!!!)  *I* don't!
I never did.  Go back through any and all of my posts; and you won't
find any such thing.  Boob and Company have been doing that for years.

Its not like they are hard to find anyway, Frank. Any first grader
with the skills to Google your name will find links to your websites
and your incest-child **** stories.

OK ... THAT is true.
But what first-grader would go looking for them ... or me?

Post by Dead Ted

As to the "rave reviews" I mention; that's only in response to people
(again like you) who attest that everybody else in the world despises
them.  Actually, I get very few "rave reviews".  Just hundreds to
single-digits in-favor versus those against.  Even of those who really
*like* my stories, I find a large majority who prefer other writers of
similar stories to mine.
I'm not THAT good a writer.

That is an understatement.

Never claimed to be.

Post by Dead Ted

pot-boiler material probably, not all that bad, but not all that great
either.  I just attest (and in court) that my material is
"literature".  Perhaps not great literature.  Maybe not even *good*
literature; but literature nonetheless.
Most writers of any type of literature really aren't all that great.
Sturgeon's law applies.  Mine is probably mediocre at best.  But
(contrary to popular opinion) writings don't have to be great, good,
or even decent to be literature.
You've been reading FAR more into my posts than ever I wrote.
I appreciate the effort, but it's really unnecessary.
The only thing I'm adamant about in defending my stories, is when
describing what they are NOT.
They're not rape stories.

*Any* sex with preteens is considered statutory rape. Your stories
feature this type of material regularly.

They're not stories of abuse.

Sex with children is child abuse.

Yeah ... You define a mid-teenager in the prime of his/her fertility
and sexual maturity as being a "child". THAT is what I object to.

Post by Dead Ted

They're not snuff stories.  (Nobody dies in "An Erotic Story".)
Oh yeah: I DO attest that they're all LOVE stories ... every one.

I would imagine some of them would probably wish they were dead if
they survived a rl situation like your smut.

I'd gladly change places with *ANY* of the main characters in any of
my stories.

Post by Dead Ted

The accusations of them being abuse, rape, snuff, and other worse
things are all made by people who really never read them; because if
they had, they wouldn't find ANY of that stuff in a single one.
The argument about whether "statutory rape" is really rape, is a
completely different discussion.  Calling something rape, especially
making a law that way, cheapens the tragedy of those who actually have
been raped.

You call a spade a spade. statutory rape *is* rape. Try telling the
judge it isnt.

Try telling somebody who has been held-down at knife-point and forced
to have sex with several men that a teenager who seduced an older man
is having the same experience SHE had.

Post by Dead Ted

Oh yeah: Your argument about my saying they're still available.
They are.  Legally, I'm not even allowed to remove them.  (Not that I
could, or even have the authority to do so except by asking politely.)
But people have to go LOOKING for them.  I don't tell anybody where to
find them or how to access them.

Again finding them is all too easy, Frank. They can easily be found
accidentally.

NOT.
Finding them is easy.
Perhaps even a bit accidentally.
Accessing and *reading* them, is not.
There are way too many layers to go through.
Yeah, the curious CAN find them.
But they have to WANT to.
And no, I'm not trying to HIDE them either.
That would defeat the whole point.
I want those who are looking for such stories to fairly-easily find
them.
I want those who DON'T want to see such stories to have at least two
and preferably three or more layers of protection and warnings, so
they can avoid seeing them.

You won't find any story with a single click of the mouse from a
search ... nor with two ... probably not even with three. But, if you
WANT my type of story, then yes, they're available without jumping
through hoops.

They're there for those who WANT such stories.
I have layers of protection and explicit warnings for those who don't.

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[DocBGK]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted
Its not like they are hard to find anyway, Frank. Any first grader
with the skills to Google your name will find links to your websites
and your incest-child **** stories.

OK ... THAT is true.
But what first-grader would go looking for them ... or me?

Budding young pedophiles go looking and you're supplying them. That's
the point that you don't seem to get, you are a supplier of material
that caters to pedophile child molesters. Most people would be grossed
out by that idea. They'd be deeply ashamed. They'd probably asked to
be locked up. But you are shameless regarding your depravity.

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
I'm not THAT good a writer.

That is an understatement.

Never claimed to be.

How can one be a good writer of purely depraved garbage? It's
impossible. No you may have been a good writer. But instead you
decided to waste any talent you might have on cranking out perverted
depraved filth about little girls being raped, abused and molested.
You are a very sick and disgusting individual. And I write that with
unemotional objectivity.

[Dead Ted]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted
Its not like they are hard to find anyway, Frank. Any first grader
with the skills to Google your name will find links to your websites
and your incest-child **** stories.

OK ... THAT is true.
But what first-grader would go looking for them ... or me?

Budding young pedophiles go looking and you're supplying them. That's
the point that you don't seem to get, you are a supplier of material
that caters to pedophile child molesters. Most people would be grossed
out by that idea. They'd be deeply ashamed. They'd probably asked to
be locked up. But you are shameless regarding your depravity.

Frank is actually very proud of his endeavors. One has to wonder about
the state of his mind constantly propagating such depravity, legal or
not. Normal males would not consider creating this type of trash. Even
the pornography establishments will not carry this type of tripe.

Tedward

[DocBGK]

Post by Dead Ted
Frank is actually very proud of his endeavors. One has to wonder about
the state of his mind constantly propagating such depravity, legal or
not. Normal males would not consider creating this type of trash. Even
the pornography establishments will not carry this type of tripe.

He's a deeply disturbed individual who's in denial.

[Nemo]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Dead Ted
Frank is actually very proud of his endeavors. One has to wonder about
the state of his mind constantly propagating such depravity, legal or
not. Normal males would not consider creating this type of trash. Even
the pornography establishments will not carry this type of tripe.

He's a deeply disturbed individual who's in denial.

Well fish eem out quick before he pollutes it then!

Nemo. (Still alive!)

[Frederick Williams]

Post by Nemo

Post by DocBGK

Post by Dead Ted
Frank is actually very proud of his endeavors. One has to wonder about
the state of his mind constantly propagating such depravity, legal or
not. Normal males would not consider creating this type of trash. Even
the pornography establishments will not carry this type of tripe.

He's a deeply disturbed individual who's in denial.

Well fish eem out quick before he pollutes it then!

De blue nial by the sound of things.

[Nemo]

Post by Frederick Williams

Post by Nemo

Post by DocBGK

Post by Dead Ted
Frank is actually very proud of his endeavors. One has to wonder about
the state of his mind constantly propagating such depravity, legal or
not. Normal males would not consider creating this type of trash. Even
the pornography establishments will not carry this type of tripe.

He's a deeply disturbed individual who's in denial.

Well fish eem out quick before he pollutes it then!

De blue nial by the sound of things.

And where it spreads out like a huge gigantic hand before it empties
into the medigeranium: Finger Niles!
(ISIRTA)

[Bill Taylor]

Post by Nemo

Post by DocBGK
He's a deeply disturbed individual who's in denial.

Well fish eem out quick before he pollutes it then!
Nemo. (Still alive!)

Oh really Neems, that's an old croc!

-- Bio-illogical Bill

[Nemo]

Post by Bill Taylor

Post by Nemo

Post by DocBGK
He's a deeply disturbed individual who's in denial.

Well fish eem out quick before he pollutes it then!
Nemo. (Still alive!)

Oh really Neems, that's an old croc!
-- Bio-illogical Bill

Meringue-arty: Right! Let's put an engine in it ans enter it in the
London to Brighton Tacky Car Dear Race, for vintage cars and
cardiologists immediately!

[DocBGK]

Post by Dead Ted
Its not like they are hard to find anyway, Frank. Any first grader
with the skills to Google your name will find links to your websites
and your incest-child rape stories.

SHHHHH! You're letting the cat out of the bag.

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
The only thing I'm adamant about in defending my stories, is when
describing what they are NOT.
They're not rape stories.

*Any* sex with preteens is considered statutory rape. Your stories
feature this type of material regularly.

In the twisted perverse depraved mind of someone like Frank, the
little 9 year old girl "wanted" it. The adult was "seduced" into
raping her etc.

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
They're not stories of abuse.

Sex with children is child abuse.

Yes it is and it has lifetime repercussions for the victim. Frank
should conger up some stories about the effects the molestation had
upon the girl later on in life. But of course the collateral damage
caused by this sort of thing, is something that a depraved sicko like
Frank wouldn't care to contemplate or admit to.

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
They're not snuff stories.  (Nobody dies in "An Erotic Story".)
Oh yeah: I DO attest that they're all LOVE stories ... every one.

I would imagine some of them would probably wish they were dead if
they survived a rl situation like your smut.

What the victims suffer as a result of the abuse Frank glorifies is
often considered worse than death by the victim. And often it ends up
being snuff by way of suicide. I'd like to see the courts force Frank
to write follow ups. One becomes a prostitute due yo her molestation.
Another a drug addict. Another commits suicide. And so on.

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
The argument about whether "statutory rape" is really rape, is a
completely different discussion.  Calling something rape, especially
making a law that way, cheapens the tragedy of those who actually have
been raped.

You call a spade a spade. statutory rape *is* rape. Try telling the
judge it isnt.

It's rape. It's abuse. It's molestation. That's a major factor in its
allure to the depraved self-serving victimizing mentalities of
pedophiles. That's why they go after little kids in the first place or
at least fantasize about it.

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
Oh yeah: Your argument about my saying they're still available.
They are.  Legally, I'm not even allowed to remove them.  (Not that I
could, or even have the authority to do so except by asking politely.)
But people have to go LOOKING for them.  I don't tell anybody where to
find them or how to access them.

Again finding them is all too easy, Frank. They can easily be found
accidentally.

Drug dealers to school kids offer up the same exact defense. "Hey,
they came looking for me". Frank will never owe up to his wrongdoing.

[-̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends bobandcaяole ▲▲▲▲]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal

Post by Frank McCoy
-???-? ??????•?? ™Usenet Legends ªºªand?a®ole

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys true
leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website in the
past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw what it was
about he fled like a predator on the run.

Can't differentiate between "Doesn't want" and "is afraid", can you?
Why would I want to look at ANY link you provide?

the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.
Most especially not, considering your comment above.
--
    _____
     /  '               / ™
  ,-/-, __  __.  ____  /_
 (_/   / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

pedo frank wouldn't want his brothers the kiddiefuckers to be
harmed...

--

''Thanking Obama for killing Bin Laden is like thanking Ronald
McDonald for the Big Mac. You thank the one who made the
burger, not the clown''

"Well he's a friend of those long haired, hippy type, pinko fags
I'll betcha he's even got a Commie flag tacked up on the wall
inside of his garage"~~The Charlie Daniels Band.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|^^^^^^^ |P
| ♥~♥ Usenet Legends bobandcarole ♥~♥ ||”"”;..\___.
| ……_______________| l______________l _||__|…, ]P
“(@)’(@)”""""""*l'(@)l'(@)l """"""""""""""(@)'(@)""""'(@)

̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™bobaлdcaяole -̮̮̃-̃
Copyright © 2013
all rights reserved
News*Justice*Social Commentary
"Bringing you the ultimate uncensored truth since 1997"
___

"I think we'll be seeing less of bobandcarole...at least while I'm
around" ~''ScottyFLL'', Former Fool & Court Jester of APH
...............................................................................................
#1 pedophile hunters: The Urban Dictionary & Evil-Unveiled.com

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bobandcarole

http://evil-unveiled.com/Alt.support.boy-lovers
........................................................................................
#5 ruiner of usenet.
.......................................................................................
Owner and trainer of Tom Evans aka "mad as a box of frogs"
aka "bit" Tom Evans actual picture:http://bayimg.com/faJBbaAcd
.........................................................................................
"Publicity is publicity, good or bad it's STILL publicity"~ Alice
Cooper
.........................................................................................
"Did you plug the hole yet Daddy?"~~Malia Obama
.........................................................................................
Now I know why they call him tiger, "ELDRICK TONT Woods"?? LMAO!! .
..............................................................................................
"There are 1000 or more reasons for a person INNOCENT of child
molesting to kill themselves"~ Arrested filth-monger frank mccoy
.............................................................................................
"A victory for one pornographer is a victory for all of the human
race"--pedophile "XXX"
...........................................................................................
Image snap of Court and Conviction Record, Scott Salberg.
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u20/ninety7gt/Intelius.jpg
..........................................................................................
"I am so superior to you that you can't even see it"~ScottyFLL
aka "Enos Penvy" aka scott salberg-- <enospenvy @null.net>
violent criminal Broward County Fla.
............................................................................................
"You are not decent citizens, you are sick, degenerate filth. The
fact that you attend church regularly proves it"~W.T.S.--
<m14m @earthlink.net>
.............................................................................................
"Only becasue they [bestiality and necrophilia] both ARE,
[harmless] for those who get off on that sort of thing. And what
*they* do is absolutely NONE of my busines NOR any of my concern NOR
that of anyone else!!"~~Craig Chilton <r @z.com> showcases why he's
designated a ko0k even by those he claims to defend and shows his
ignorance in using a spell checker..
.............................................................................................
"I understand, you guys{The UTB} i assume you belong? have been
around forever, and are clearly a force to be reckoned with"~~Carl
<carrrrrrl @gmail.com> makes a correct statement for the first time in
his life
..............................................................................................

Why should I have to press one for English??? This is AMERICA
<This space for rent> .

[%]

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends bobandcaяole ▲▲▲▲

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal

Post by Frank McCoy
-???-? ??????•?? ™Usenet Legends ªºªand?a®ole

Post by -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by Dead Ted

Post by Frank McCoy
No, I don't plan on ever looking at the link.

Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex
offenders?

Because I don't care WHAT it's about.
Ain't looking to find out.

As it happens to be a link to a sex offenders website {WE aren't
afraid to check}, it shows ramBUTTS true pedophilia leanings as he
would prefer them banned altogether. It also shows frank mccoys
true leanings as he hasn't EVER been afraid to access a website
in the past. Our guess is he did indeed access it and when he saw
what it was about he fled like a predator on the run.

Can't differentiate between "Doesn't want" and "is afraid", can
you? Why would I want to look at ANY link you provide?

the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could
be attacked and beaten or worse.

OK ... Still wouldn't want to follow the link.
Most especially not, considering your comment above.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

pedo frank wouldn't want his brothers the kiddiefuckers to be
harmed...

everything ok bob

[DocBGK]

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

Looks like a stupid attempt at putting the safety of potential future
victims ahead of the victimizers. Poor victimizers.

[Frank McCoy]

Post by DocBGK

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

Looks like a stupid attempt at putting the safety of potential future
victims ahead of the victimizers. Poor victimizers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2012/05/arrests-made-in-attacks-on-alleged-jerusalem-pedophile-456.html

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[DocBGK]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

Looks like a stupid attempt at putting the safety of potential future
victims ahead of the victimizers. Poor victimizers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2012/05/arrests-ma...

Why don't you post a link involving someone on a registered sex
offenders list instead of stuff indirectly linked to the point you're
trying to make?

If your house had had "sick pedophilic pervert" spray painted all over
it, it wouldn't distress me in the least.

Pedophiles and their ilk always whining about hysteria and witch
hunts. Tough shit.

[Frank McCoy]

Post by DocBGK

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

Looks like a stupid attempt at putting the safety of potential future
victims ahead of the victimizers. Poor victimizers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2012/05/arrests-ma...

Why don't you post a link involving someone on a registered sex
offenders list instead of stuff indirectly linked to the point you're
trying to make?
If your house had had "sick pedophilic pervert" spray painted all over
it, it wouldn't distress me in the least.

How about if YOUR house had such crap painted all over it because you
hang out in this newsgroup and some vigilante thought that made YOU a
pedophile? Sounds fair to ME!

Post by DocBGK
Pedophiles and their ilk always whining about hysteria and witch
hunts. Tough shit.

When a doctor gets chased out of house and home because of vigilantes
mistaking "pediatrician" for "pedophile"?

When a crazy woman gets innocent people branded as pedophiles?

That's not "witch hunts"?

And those two are just the tip of the iceberg.
I found hundreds of similar cases with a simple search.

--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[DocBGK]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK
If your house had had "sick pedophilic pervert" spray painted all over
it, it wouldn't distress me in the least.

How about if YOUR house had such crap painted all over it because you
hang out in this newsgroup and some vigilante thought that made YOU a
pedophile?  Sounds fair to ME!

First, I'm hanging out in alt.vacation.las-vegas. Second, you are
actually a sick pedophilic pervert. or are you going to claim that
such a description doesn't apply to a man who cranked out reams of
sleazy erotica involving adults having sex with kids?

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK
Pedophiles and their ilk always whining about hysteria and witch
hunts. Tough shit.

When a doctor gets chased out of house and home because of vigilantes
mistaking "pediatrician" for "pedophile"?
When a crazy woman gets innocent people branded as pedophiles?
That's not "witch hunts"?
And those two are just the tip of the iceberg.
I found hundreds of similar cases with a simple search.

The problem is that pedophiles exist. Pedophilia is the root cause and
problem. What would be a better solution; society embracing
pedophilia or pedophiles seeing how much harm they cause and putting
an end to their depravity? The latter never seems to be an option with
your ilk.

[Nemo]

Post by Frank McCoy

Post by DocBGK

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
the boob did not provide the link. I did. I guarantee it to be legal
and virus free. And yes it is a website identifying sex offenders. I
oppose such websites as unconstitutional and likely to stir up
vigilantism. Because of these sites those poor men and women could be
attacked and beaten or worse.

Looks like a stupid attempt at putting the safety of potential future
victims ahead of the victimizers. Poor victimizers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society

This also happened some time ago after our magnificent News of the World
news-scraper outed a load of alleged pædophiles and a rabid gang of
thugs smashed all the windows of a house belonging to a paediatrician.

Same excuse: It sounded similar!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_of_the_World

Post by Frank McCoy
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2012/05/arrests-made-in-attacks-on-alleged-jerusalem-pedophile-456.html
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_

[Bill Taylor]

Post by Nemo
This also happened some time ago after our magnificent News of the World
news-scraper outed a load of alleged pædophiles and a rabid gang of
thugs smashed all the windows of a house belonging to a paediatrician.

And all he ever wanted to do was treat people's feet!

-- Two-toed Taylor (with apologies to Farty Towells)

[David Simpson]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 00:39:20 -0700 (PDT), Bill Taylor

Post by Bill Taylor

Post by Nemo
This also happened some time ago after our magnificent News of the World
news-scraper outed a load of alleged pædophiles and a rabid gang of
thugs smashed all the windows of a house belonging to a paediatrician.

And all he ever wanted to do was treat people's feet!
-- Two-toed Taylor (with apologies to Farty Towells)

Babies?

[Nemo]

Post by David Simpson
On Wed, 29 May 2013 00:39:20 -0700 (PDT), Bill Taylor

Post by Bill Taylor

Post by Nemo
This also happened some time ago after our magnificent News of the World
news-scraper outed a load of alleged pædophiles and a rabid gang of
thugs smashed all the windows of a house belonging to a paediatrician.

And all he ever wanted to do was treat people's feet!
-- Two-toed Taylor (with apologies to Farty Towells)

Babies?

Big uns!

[Frederick Williams]

Post by Dead Ted
Is that because it is a site identifying registered sex offenders?

I didn't know you had to register to be a sex offender. Is there an
annual subscription as well?

[r***@truthonly.com.Sword of Baal]

Why do people use my address and name?


The message below was not from me.

Post by ***@truthonly.com.swordofbaal
Websites such as this only stirs up the vigilantism of the public.
Banning these sites would bring a bit of sanity and unprejudiced
realism to an otherwise warped situation.
http://www.kidslivesafe.com/signup/default23.aspx?c=19&scn=WPGoogle&sca=Master&gclid=CM_yyKi4-rUCFadFMgodRSAACQ&vid=242054415ec4e4967fb292966f697a0e

[Dead Ted]

Post by r***@truthonly.com.Sword of Baal
Why do people use my address and name?
The message below was not from me.

Yeah right liar.
You are caught again.

Tedward

[r***@truthonly.com.Sword of Baal]

Post by Dead Ted

Post by r***@truthonly.com.Sword of Baal
Why do people use my address and name?
The message below was not from me.

Yeah right liar.
You are caught again.

If you had half a brain you could see that